Gwynne's testimony was more measured but no less painful. She struggled with bulimia as a teenager and drank to excess into her early 20s. "I just made it go away," she said of the trauma. "Unsuccessfully". She acknowledged that her father knew he was making them uncomfortable: "Maybe every father has some feelings about his daughters turning into young women, and they know it's verboten, so they don't go near it. My father knew it was verboten, so he found a way to luxuriate in his fantasies without, he thought, putting both feet over the line".
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
MoMA’s media and performance department holds extensive collections of 20th-century video art, including pieces by Rivers.
Rivers filmed his daughters at strict six-month intervals.
The case resonates far beyond the art world. It forces us to confront fundamental questions about the relationship between art and exploitation, the limits of artistic freedom, and the rights of subjects—especially children—to control their own images. As Emma wrote: "Perhaps, instead of seeing me as a rose among thorns, my father saw me as another thorn". --- Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers LINK Download
The film documents the lives of Rivers' two daughters, Gwynne and Emma, over several years.
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
Rivers' defenders argue that has serious artistic value—that it is a legitimate exploration of adolescent development, body image, and the father-daughter relationship. Emma and her supporters counter that the context cannot sanitize the content: filming one's own pre-adolescent daughters nude, asking them sexually charged questions, and using that footage as "art" does not negate the harm inflicted.
Art vs. The Destruction of Innocence | - The Art | Crime Archive Gwynne's testimony was more measured but no less painful
He bridged the gap between the emotional weight of Abstract Expressionism and the commercial irony of Pop Art.
The documentary is a highly controversial and largely unreleased film created by the American Pop artist Larry Rivers . Historical Context
. Rivers famously asked them intrusive questions about their changing bodies, sexuality, and emerging breasts.
Larry Rivers' 1981 documentary, , is a controversial 45-minute film documenting his daughters' transition to adulthood that was suppressed due to ethical concerns and objections from the subjects regarding privacy violations. Following legal pressure, the footage was restricted and returned to the estate, making it unavailable for public download or distribution. Information on this film is available through various archival studies. "Unsuccessfully"
After a front-page exposé by The New York Times detailing the family's distress, NYU officially withdrew its acquisition of Growing . The university requested the foundation remove the problematic materials from the collection entirely.
: The footage focuses on the physical development of his daughters, often depicting them naked or topless
Keep in mind that availability and accessibility may vary depending on your location and the platforms available in your region.
: The footage remains under the control of the Larry Rivers Foundation. There have been ongoing legal discussions regarding whether the tapes should be preserved as part of an artistic legacy or destroyed to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.